The word Gnostic comes from the Greek word ‘gnosis’, which means knowledge. The word is used by historians to describe a school of thought. Gnosticism arose from a group of evil workers who claimed to have higher light, special spiritual knowledge, or “secret wisdom”. This movement began in the days of the apostles, and continued into the 5th century. Before John died, the seeds of Gnosticism had been sown; perhaps even before Paul's death (1 Tim. 6:20). John’s epistles are written to defend against the inroads of Gnosticism (2 John 1:7,9). Peter warns of their false teaching, and Jude warns of its moral effect on the Christian testimony. Gnosticism is responsible for not just one heresy, but seven or eight. What is it? In this mystical system, the spiritual world was good, and material world was evil. They rejected the incarnation, because it connects the human with the divine. The Gnostics would try to separate “Jesus” from “Christ”, by making Christ an emanation (a shining out from a source) from God that never truly became flesh, or else was united to a mere man named Jesus at his baptism, but returned to God before Jesus’ death on the cross. In doing so, this evil system annulled the incarnation, the atonement, and the resurrection. The New Testament anticipates this irreverent and wicked system of doctrine by stating the simple truth of Christ's Person and work.
Read more…Introduction (vv.1-4)
Salutation: Writer and Recipient Introduced (vv.1-2)
- Mercy is God’s intervention and deliverance on the part of His people. Mercy is usually only added when an epistle is addressed to an individual, because the saints collectively are never looked at as an object of mercy, but of grace. Jude is the only exception to this rule, and the reason suggested is that the epistle describes circumstances so grave that the need for “mercy” in the
- Peace refers to settled peace with God (Rom. 5:1), not only with regard to our standing, but also with regard to our circumstances. The circumstances in Jude are the most unsettling naturally, so peace is especially needed.
- Love here is the sacrificial and unconditional love of a settled disposition that God has for us. This is the only epistle where love is prayed for in the greeting! It is fitting that in the darkest of days the saints be reminded of God’s unconditional love.
Prefatory Comments: the Purpose of the Epistle (vv.3-4)
- Turning the grace of God into a license to satisfy the flesh. This is the teaching that, as Christians, we can do whatever we want. It is the sin of using the grace of God against the holiness of God. This evil is not unique to the day Jude lived in. We see it prevalent in the house of God today. We must ask ourselves about every doctrine we are presented with; what is its tendency?
- Refusing to recognize the authority of the Lord. Jude owns the absolute authority and lordship of Christ over the believer; but these ones denied it, as they despised every form of authority (vv.8-10).
Warning Concerning Apostate Intruders (vv.5-23)
God’s Judgment on Those who Depart From their God-given Place (vv.5-7)
Case #1: The Unbelieving Israelites, who Fell in the Wilderness (v.5)
Case #2: The Disobedient Angels who Left their First Estate (v.6)
Case #3: The Immoral Cities of Sodom and Gomorrah (v.7)
Characteristics: Dreaming, Defiling, and Despising (vv.8-10)
Three Avenues of Evil (v.11)
- The Way of Cain (self-will) is shown in that he wanted to approach God in his own way. The sacrifices of Cain and Abel represent two approaches to God. All down through human history, there have only been two approaches. The first approach is to come to God seeking acceptance on the ground of man’s own works; a bloodless sacrifice. Jude speaks of this as “the way of Cain”. The second approach is to come to God on the value of a life offered up in death, which was Abel’s approach. Cain’s way is seen in the introduction of a bloodless gospel; a natural man’s religion of works. This is an insult to the work of Christ, and an insult to the grace of God!
- The Error of Balaam (self-interest) was that he was willing to sell his gift or office for money. Balaam was a prophet motived by the love of money. He was a professional. He was willing to do anything, including curse the people of God, “for reward”. This is the kind of corruption that invaded the church after the adoption of a clerical system. In God’s government, Balaam is mentioned among the casualties when the Israelites fought against the Midianites (Num. 31:8). He showed his true colors and suffered death as an enemy of the people of God.
- The Gainsaying of Cora (self-importance) was an attempt to throw off God’s order and replace it with man’s order. Korah led a rebellion against the leadership of Moses and Aaron, challenging their authority. Along with his supporters, he accused Moses and Aaron of exalting themselves above the rest of the people. He had no respect for the order that God had established in making Moses the leader and Aaron the priest. Korah was guilty of party-making, in an attempt to gather supporters around himself. Infamously, the earth opened up and swallowed Korah and his followers along with their households, and they were consumed by fire.
A Full Catalog of the Character of the Apostates (vv.12-16)
- “Spots“. This is an illusion to sunken rocks with the sea over them. They are a sailor’s nightmare because they are hard to detect and can do serious damage to a vessel. So were the apostate infiltrators. They were attending the saints’ “love feasts”, which were like a fellowship meal. They were there, among the brethren “without fear”, and so bold as to feed themselves and profit from the generosity of the saints.
- “Clouds“. Often clouds bring the expectation of rain. Clouds without water carry the promise of refreshment but don’t perform. So with these false teachers; there is nothing in their ministry that feeds the soul or refreshes the hearts the saints. Further, they are carried by the winds of doctrine; there is nothing stable with them.
- “Trees“. Tress ought to bear fruit, but these do not. They are twice dead: (1) without Divine Life, (2) by apostasy. They are not rooted and grounded.
- “Waves“. These are raging waves of the ocean, unstable and destructive, and “foaming out their own shames”.
- “Stars“. Stars often represent that which gives moral light and provides guidance, but these are “wandering stars”. A wandering star was one that did not obey the predicable path across the night sky. Perhaps it would have been a planet that a sailor could mistake for a star, and consequently be led off-course. These false teachers were like that: unreliable guides. There end would be eternal punishment. While the “lake of fire” speaks of the eternal judgment of God, the “blackness of darkness” gives the thought of total isolation. Both are figurative, else how could it be black if there was fire?
Recollection of the Apostles’ Words about the Last Time (vv.17-19)
Practical Exhortations: The Christian’s Occupation (vv.20-23)
- Collective building ourselves up in the Christian faith. We must begin by establishing ourselves in the body of Christian truth (called “your most holy faith” here, or the “faith once delievered to the saints” in v.3), through the Word of God. This is the only place where “the truth” is called “most holy”, and it is in a dark day. The antidote for apostasy is not looseness in doctrine and practice. Just as an army under attack builds up ramparts or bulwarks, so Christian’s must built themselves up in the truth of God’s Word. How do we build ourselves up? We need the individual aspect, reading and meditating on God’s Word. But we also need the collective aspect; the assembling of ourselves together for mutual edification. We need the gifts to be built up (Eph. 4). In history we see that the tendency is for the church to build up a hierarchy, but it is far better to start by building ourselves up in our most holy faith. Notice that Jude addresses the saints directly, not a clergy.
- Praying in the Holy Spirit. Coupled with taking in the word of God is the need for prayer. This is a prayer “in the Holy Spirit”, or prayer that is in perfect accord with the mind of God, through the help of the Spirit that dwells within us (read Rom. 8:26-27).4 It implies a soul in communion with God. If we are not in communion, we must confess whatever sin is keeping us from abiding in Christ.
- Keeping ourselves in the enjoyment of God’s love. The third key to preservation is the maintenance of communion. How do we keep ourselves in the love of God? We cannot compel God to love or hate us. Nor does this exhortation imply keeping up our own affections for God, which would be a form of legalism. Rather, this refers to keeping ourselves in the enjoyment of God’s love for us! The Holy Spirit is working to spread that love abroad in our hearts (Rom. 5:5). The more we enjoy His love, the greater our confidence in Him, and the less we will be tempted to compromise with the world, to listen to the devil, or to indulge the flesh. As with “build”, so with “keep” there is a miliary connotation. A “keep” is the strongest or central tower of a castle, acting as a final refuge under attack. The enjoyment of God’s love is the strongest antidote to evil!
- Looking for the Lord’s mercy (including His coming) Finally, the believer is given the expectation of the Lord’s mercy along the pathway, culminating in the Lord’s coming for His saints as the ultimate mercy that ushers us into the sphere of “eternal life” in its future aspect. This hope has a preserving influence in our lives. We already have eternal life as a present possession (that is how John usually uses the expression). But “eternal life” here is looked at as a future possession, when those of us who possess it now will enjoy it in our heavenly, native environment.5 The rapture is part of that “mercy” because of the severity of the apostasy.
- The fortifications – building up ourselves on our most holy faith
- The battlefield communications – praying in the Holy Spirit
- The inner keep – abiding in the enjoyment of God’s love
- The reconnaissance effort – looking for the mercy of the Lord Jesus Christ
- Some (instigators) should be convicted. For those who are disputing against the truth, we are to convict them of evil. In this case it is not a matter of compassion, although our words should be always with grace, seasoned with salt. Rather, The word “dispute” is the same as in v.9 where Satan disputed about Moses’ body. Michael simply said, “the Lord rebuke thee”. These individuals are mere professors, promoting false doctrine and attacking the truth. They are the leaders, doing the work of deceiving. An example would be how the Lord Jesus dealt with the Pharisees and scribes in Matthew 23. He denounced their hypocrisy and self-will.
- Some (deceived) should be rescued. Next we have those who are led astray by deceivers. For those who are taken captive, we are to save, not in the eternal sense (only God can do that), but in the practical sense of delivering them from an evil system. The image is of a stick of wood at the side of a fire that is moments away from being engulfed in flames. We can be God’s firemen as well as fishermen! See 2 Tim. 2:24-26.
- Some (stubbornly entrenched) we should have compassion for. There is a third class we are only told to have compassion for. Perhaps we have tried convicting them, tried saving them, but they are fixed in their course. In our compassion we should never think lightly of sin; “hating even the garment spotted by the flesh”. We may endeavor to help them, but it must be “with fear”. The fear is for the soul we are seeking to help (2 Cor. 5:11), but it also should be concerning our own conduct. We can be defiled even when rescuing others, see Num. 19:10.
Conclusion: Prayer and Doxology (vv.24-25)
- He is not the brother of James the son of Zebedee — John was his brother. That James was cut off from very early days indeed, and John was left latest of all; so different was the issue for these two sons of Zebedee. There was another James (as also another Jude or Judas, besides the Iscariot), “son of Alphaeus,” who is named “James the Little” (Mark 15:40). I do not think that this is the James referred to here, but rather that he is the one who has been called “James the Just”; and I presume that this title was given to him because of his practical pre-eminence. He was a hater of evil and a lover of all that was morally pleasing to God. He comes before us too, in Acts 15, though not for the first time there. – W. Kelly. Exposition of Jude.
- We have already noticed this difference between the epistle of Jude and the second of Peter, that Peter speaks of sin, Jude of apostasy, the departure of the assembly from its primitive state before God. Departure from the holiness of faith is the subject that Jude treats. – Darby, J.N. Synopsis of the Books of the Bible.
- “… those people who live in the imagination of their own hearts instead of being guided by the word of God. Why? Because the word of God is an expression of God’s authority, and His will is the only thing that ought to guide us, as well as all mankind.” – Kelly, W. The Epistle of Jude.
- There is a great deal of prayer that is not in the Holy Ghost. And we are not at all called upon only to pray in the Holy Ghost. Happy is he who does, and happy are they that hear prayer in the Holy Spirit. And where there is prayer in the Holy Spirit all is thoroughly acceptable to God, every word is so. Every word of such prayer expresses perfectly what God means at that time. But there are prayers that begin in the Spirit and do not end in the Spirit. Prayers are often rather mixed, and this is true even of real believers; and sometimes we pray foolishly, sometimes we pray unintelligently! This is never in the Holy Ghost. – W. Kelly. Exposition of the Epistle of Jude.
- Is it only by the way? No, it is all along the way, to the very end — “unto life eternal,” the great consummation. This could not be unless they already had life eternal in Christ now; but this mercy of God, “of our Lord Jesus Christ unto life eternal,” looks at the full heavenly consummation. – Kelly, W. The Epistle of Jude.
- Now we come to a passage which I feel to be unusually difficult to expound; and the reason is this. The original authorities and the best authorities are all in confusion about it. This is very rarely the case in the New Testament, but it is the case here. All the great authorities are at sixes and sevens in the testimony they give of these two verses (22, 23). …Our Version … looks at two cases only… Now I believe there are three classes, and not two only. … I am certainly open to anything that might be shown to the contrary, but as yet no one has shown it. No one at all. … First of all Jude says, “And some convict when contending.” The fact is, compassion belongs to another class, not to this one at all… “Making a difference,” as in the Authorised, should rather be, “when they dispute.” It is the people that are being convicted who of course make the dispute, instead of the person that shows compassion making a difference among them. It is quite a different idea. … These then are the three classes: a disputatious class to be convicted and silenced — then, those that are to be saved, snatched out of the fire — and, others to be compassionated with fear, hating the garment spotted by the flesh. So that this all tends to complete the picture of the danger to souls. – Kelly, W. The Epistle of Jude.